Democrats and liberals believe there are two kinds of racism and discrimination.
“Good” racism and discrimination is when minorities can take advantage over non-minorities through affirmative action and other preferential programs and laws. Liberal minorities justify discrimination against non-minorities in the name of social justice, and people like Elizabeth Warren use this “good” racism to further her career by claiming to be a minority (American Indian).
“Bad” racism is any action by non-minorities that liberals and Democrats define as offensive including costumes and language. For example, whites in black-face or wearing MAGA hats are considered offensive and racist, no matter how innocent the intention or behavior.
The fact is that liberals and Democrats define racism according to their political agenda. There is no "social" justice, only justice, and there's no "good" or "bad" racism, just racism, and it is always bad.
Hispanic-First Hispanics and Anti-America Hispanics are demanding an apology from NBC's Tom Brokaw on for saying that Hispanics should "work harder at assimilation." Brokaw commented during a conversation on NBC’s “Meet the Press” about immigration on Sunday, Jan. 27.
However, the fact is that Hispanics/Latinos are not melting into American society as other immigrant groups have, and self-segregation is hurting them.
Hispanics live next door to Latin America, and their language and culture are kept alive and refreshed by uncontrolled immigration and Spanish language media in the United States.
Furthermore, liberal political correctness encourages multiculturalism which condemns American values. Ethnic and racial nationalism discourages Hispanics from assimilating and justifies ethnic separatism.
Race-baiting Hispanic Texas Democrat Congressman Joaquin Castro from San Antonio called Brokaw "ignorant," but in fact, discouraging assimilation does not serve Hispanic immigrants at all.
All immigrants should learn English and embrace the values that made America great, such as economic self-sufficiency, competition, and individuality.
Democrats want Hispanics to be tribal, and to depend on community leaders or political bosses. Herding Hispanics together based on their ethnicity is the Democrats’ political plan.
Hispanics and all immigrants should assimilate rather than retain their old world values and recreate their nation here in the US.
What’s the point of coming to America if you don’t become American?
A Washington Post article dated Dec. 28, 2018, reports that Democrats are perplexed that Hispanic/Latino support for President Trump continues to be above 30%, even in the face of Trump's immigration hard line. However, the article reveals their lack of understanding about conservative Latino voters, and it also shows ignorance and racism by Democrats towards Latinos in general.
In the November 2018 midterm elections, 32 percent of Latinos voted for Republicans, according to an AP VoteCast data survey conducted by the University of Chicago. Democrats and their liberal media allies wonder why Latinos aren’t voting 80-20 or 90-10 the way black voters vote?
Though Democrats consider Latino voters to be a crucial part of their liberal-leftist-progressive coalition, there is a large and steady bloc of Republican Latinos even on immigration issues. There are several reasons why Hispanics/Latinos are not following the black voting pattern.
As if to show the apparent collusion between the liberal Mainstream Media and leftist activists, NBC’s Today interviewed Nathan Phillips, the Native American elder seen beating his drum in an encounter with Covington Catholic High School junior Nick Sandmann, and he said HE FORGIVES the students! While video of Phillips and other leftist minority groups has surfaced that clearly shows he provoked the confrontation, Phillips said he BELIEVES the teen has been insincere in his public response, and NBC did not challenge him on that point with the facts.
Such is the state of the liberal/leftist media in their alliance with the left-wing activists. The media promotes the leftist narrative and version of events, even when it is not true.
Many people have sarcastically said that “liberals are mentally ill,” but here is a clear example of a major media interview where the facts were ignored, while a false narrative (a lie) left unchallenged. When people cannot distinguish between fact from fiction, between right and wrong, they are “delusional.” The liberals and the liberal media are suffering from mass psychosis.
Furthermore, the liberals don’t seem to tolerate the media even when it tries to consider “both sides” of a story. NBC “Today” co-host Savannah Guthrie was condemned on Wednesday, Jan. 23, by liberals when she interviewed Sandmann on the “Today" show.
Savannah's critics were upset because they said she gave Sandmann a “platform” to tell his side. For leftists, there is only their point of view, or as dictators would say, “the official story.”
The cooperation between the liberal Media and leftist activists and politicians couldn’t be more apparent than with this story. However, this bias reporting happens quietly on a daily basis. Unsuspecting and uninformed citizens read and hear the liberal/leftist official story daily, and even the liberal entertainment industry helps promote it.
The liberal media is pushing American society to the point where the politically correct narrative is more important than the facts or truth. This nation is reaching a dangerous tipping point regarding political reality and reality in general.
For the truth to make us free, we must hear it and not fear it.
In another example of character assassination by the leftist media and the Democrats, The New Yorker Magazine broke the story of another allegation of sexual misconduct by Supreme Court nominee, Judge Brett Kavanaugh. However, the story, by Ronan Farrow and Jane Mayer, has been unraveling since the New Yorker published it on Sunday, Sept. 23.
The accuser, Deborah Ramirez, told the New Yorker she had “significant gaps in her memories” regarding the alleged college party from 1983. However, the New Yorker reported that after six days of “consulting” with a Democratic lawyer, Ramirez believed Kavanaugh was the supposed man who exposed himself to her at a party while they attended Yale University. Really?
Furthermore, The New Yorker admitted that it “has not confirmed with other eyewitnesses that Kavanaugh was present at the party.” Even Ramirez’s best friend from her college days has claimed that she never heard about the incident.